Home 用中文 Espaņol  
News & Opinion
Legal Hotline
Membership
Asked & Answered
Access To Meetings
Access To Records
News Gathering
Prop 59
CFAC Podcasts
Model Letters
Books
AG Opinions
CFAC In The News
CFAC Assembly
About Us
Contact Us


Enter your e-mail to receive our bi-weekly FLASH newsletter:




Copyright 2005, Associated Press

Calif. court blocks accused priest data

(Associated Press 4/13/05) -- The California Supreme Court on Tuesday temporarily blocked the release of summaries of personnel files of 117 priests accused of molestation.

The move came just minutes before the documents were to become public on the Los Angeles Archdiocese Web site, publicly identifying for the first time some accused priests.

The files also had been expected to provide an unprecedented look at how the archdiocese handled suspected child molesters - when the church was told of alleged misconduct, who made the report and what action was taken.

The state Supreme Court intervened less than 15 minutes before the files were to be released by sending the case back to the appeals court that had cleared the way for the material to be made public, said Donald Steier, an attorney who represents 26 of the priests.

The court did not immediately give a reason for its decision.

Steier called the court's action a victory for his clients as well as anyone involved in confidential mediation proceedings.

Victims of alleged abuse reacted with anger to the delay.

``Of course, we're disappointed,'' said Mary Grant, spokeswoman for Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests. ``Now the little truth that could have come out of (the release) is being blocked again.''

The archdiocese also said it was ``disappointed'' the files were not released Tuesday.

In a statement, the archdiocese said it intended to make the material public ``as part of its promise to be forthright and transparent. ... It continues to be our intention to release this information if and when court rulings allow it.''

The files are the result of mediation efforts between the archdiocese and attorneys for victims aimed at settling some 550 molestation claims against the nation's largest archdiocese.

The material was to have been posted on the archdiocese Web site last December. But Steier won an emergency stay from the 2nd District Court of Appeal. The panel, however, rejected his petition to make the stay permanent.

The abuse lawsuits were filed under a 2002 state law that suspended for one year the statute of limitations for sexual abuse claims. They are among nearly 1,000 claims filed against the Roman Catholic Church in California under that law.

The church is battling to keep full personnel files from prosecutors investigating at least two Los Angeles priests for alleged sex crimes.

A retired judge appointed to review those cases said last September that prosecutors could review those files as part of their investigation. The ruling has been appealed.

Church attorneys contend the files are protected by the First Amendment because they contain confidential communications between priests and confessors.

The church also said turning over the documents would violate the separation of church and state.

By Gillian Flaccus

 

join


Have a legal question?
Check out Asked & Answered first. Chances are, we've already answered it. If not, then proceed to CFAC's Legal Hotline for help from top lawyers—free.


CFAC Archives:


Search CFAC
Google
WWW cfac.org