Home 用中文 Espaņol  
News & Opinion
Legal Hotline
Membership
Asked & Answered
Access To Meetings
Access To Records
News Gathering
Prop 59
CFAC Podcasts
Model Letters
Books
AG Opinions
CFAC In The News
CFAC Assembly
About Us
Contact Us


Enter your e-mail to receive our bi-weekly FLASH newsletter:




California Public Records Act:
Basic Terms and Concepts


Return to main menu

 

Q: What is the basic law providing public access to local government information and records in California?

Q: What is the purpose of the CPRA?

Q: What information does the CPRA cover? What does the word "public" mean?

Q: Which local agencies does the CPRA apply to?

Q: Which if any non-governmental organizations are subject to the CPRA?

Q: Would a local office of the California state government be covered by the CPRA?

Q: Would a local office of the federal government be covered by the CPRA?

Q: Assuming we're dealing with a covered agency, which of its "records" does the CPRA apply to? What does the Act mean by "records"?

Q: What if an agency says that under its policy or nomenclature, a certain document is not considered a "record" or a "public record"? Does the CPRA still apply?

Q: What if an agency doesn't have to create or keep a certain document, but does so just for its own convenience or "internal" purposes? Does the CPRA apply then?

Q: Is the CPRA's scope limited to documents in verbal form? What if there are no words involved?

Q: Who has access rights under the CPRA?

Q: Are access rights limited to living, breathing "persons"?

Q: Why the distinction between "person" and "member of the public"? Aren't they the same?

Q: Do public officials have any special status in making CPRA requests?

Q: Does a public agency have some leeway in adopting regulations about public access to records?

Q: Do many agencies provide better access than is strictly required under the CPRA?

 

 

 

 

Q: What is the basic law providing public access to local government information and records in California?

A: The law is called the California Public Records Act (CPRA), and begins with California Government Code Section 6250.

Back to top

 

Q: What is the purpose of the CPRA?

A: It purpose is to permit the public to understand how the government is performing its functions. As stated in its preamble (Section 6250), the law was enacted because "the Legislature, mindful of the right of individuals to privacy, finds and declares that access to information concerning the conduct of the people's business is a fundamental and necessary right of every person in this state."

Back to top

 

Q: What information does the CPRA cover? What does the word "public" mean?

A: In the term "public records", the "public" element refers to material held by agencies of California's state and local governments, as stated in subdivision (d) of Section 6252, and as furtther elaborated in subdivisions (a) and (b):

"(d) 'Public records' includes any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public's business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics.

"(a) 'State agency' means every state office, officer, department, division, bureau, board, and commission or other state body or agency, except those agencies provided for in Article IV (except Section 20 thereof) or Article VI of the California Constitution.

"(b) 'Local agency' includes a county; city, whether general law or chartered; city and county; school district; municipal corporation; district; political subdivision; or any board, commission or agency thereof; other local public agency; or nonprofit organizations of local governmental agencies and officials which are supported solely by public funds.

Back to top

 

Q: Which local agencies does the CPRA apply to?

A: On the local level, all government agencies but courts are covered - essentially the same field governed by the Ralph M. Brown Act with respect to meetings. The California Supreme Court has held that county grand juries, although not strictly speaking "provided for" in Article VI of the California Constitution, are essentially agencies of the courts and therefore exempt from the Act (McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior Court, 44 Cal. 3d 1162 (1988)).

Back to top

 

Q: Which if any non-governmental organizations are subject to the CPRA?

A: The Act covers an association of local officials or agencies, but only if all its funding comes from governmental sources.

Back to top

 

Q: Would a local office of the California state government be covered by the CPRA?

A. Yes. As noted in Section 6252(b), the Act applies to the records of state as well as local agencies.

Back to top

 

Q: Would a local office of the federal government be covered by the CPRA?

A. No. The CPRA reaches only California government agencies. Federal agencies (that is, divisions or departments in the executive branch) are subject to the Freedom of Information Act (Title 5 U.S.C. 552 et seq.).

Back to top

 

Q: Assuming we're dealing with a covered agency, which of its "records" does the CPRA apply to? What does the Act mean by "records"?

A: The "records" element of "public records" is comprehensive. As noted above, it refers to any "writing" concerning the public's business, subdivision (e) of Section 6252 states:

"Writing" means handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photographing, and every other means of recording upon any form of communication or representation, including letters, words, pictures, sounds, or symbols, or combination thereof, and all papers, maps, magnetic or paper tapes, photographic films and prints, magnetic or punched cards, discs, drums, and other documents.

Back to top

 

Q: What if an agency says that under its policy or nomenclature, a certain document is not considered a "record" or a "public record"? Does the CPRA still apply?

A: Yes. Agencies cannot escape the mandates of the Act by taking the position that their records do not meet some more specialized definition of "public records" elsewhere in the law, so long as they fall within the broad definitions in Section 6252 (Cook v. Craig, 55 Cal. App. 3d 773 (California Court of Appeal, 3d Dist. 1976).

Back to top

 

Q: What if an agency doesn't have to create or keep a certain document, but does so just for its own convenience or "internal" purposes? Does the CPRA apply then?

A: Yes. The Act applies to records whether they are required by law to be created and maintained or whether they are a matter of the agency's own discretion and convenience - unless a statute specifically provides that only records required to be kept need be made accessible, for example with respect to county assessor's records (Statewide Homeowners, Inc. v. Williams, 30 Cal. App. 3d 567 (California Court of Appeal, 4th Dist. 1973)).

Back to top

 

Q: Is the CPRA's scope limited to documents in verbal form? What if there are no words involved?

A: The "writings" encompassed in the definition of which "records" are subject to the Act involve far more than the medium of words. They include every perceptible item in any form which is fixed and reproducible enough to be communicated in some manner - verbal or nonverbal, qualitative or quantitative information, mediated by whatever technology.

Back to top

 

Q: Who has access rights under the CPRA?

A: Generally, any "person" can inspect or copy records subject to the Act. Government Code Section 6252 states that, as used in the Act:

(c) 'Person' includes any natural person, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, firm, or association.

(f) 'Member of the public' means any person, except a member, agent, officer, or employee of a federal, state, or local agency acting within the scope of his or her membership, agency, office, or employment.

Back to top

 

Q: Are access rights limited to living, breathing "persons"?

A: No. The universe of those with rights of access under the CPRA is not limited to living individuals. Note that under subdivision (c), any private organization with a legal personality - capable of suing and being sued - is also an entitled "person".

Back to top

 

Q: Why the distinction between "person" and "member of the public"? Aren't they the same?

A: Elsewhere in the CPRA it is stated that an agency's ability to consider a record confidential may be waived if that same record has already been disclosed to a "member of the public". The distinction in subdivision (f) simply clarifies that a waiver will not occur if the record is shown to a government official acting in his or her official capacity.

Back to top

 

Q: Do public officials have any special status in making CPRA requests?

A: Ordinarily, no. But there is one public officer which the CPRA treats with special rules - the district attorney. The principal differences from the general rules are that a state or local licensing agency may not use the exemption for investigative records to deny access to the district attorney, and that the deadline of 10 working days from the request for records requires not only a "determination" as to whether the record is exempt, but the actual production of any non-exempt records. Otherwise the rules are quite similar to the general provisions:

Section 6262. The exemption of records of complaints to, or investigations conducted by, any state or local agency for licensing purposes under subdivision (f) of Section 6254 shall not apply when a request for inspection of such records is made by a district attorney.Section 6263. A state or local agency shall allow an inspection or copying of any public record or class of public records not exempted by this chapter when requested by a district attorney.

Section 6264.The district attorney may petition a court of competent jurisdiction to require a state or local agency to allow him to inspect or receive a copy of any public record or class of public records not exempted by this chapter when the agency fails or refuses to allow inspection or copying within 10 working days of a request. The court may require a public agency to permit inspection or copying by the district attorney unless the public interest or good cause in withholding such records clearly outweighs the public interest in disclosure.

Section 6265. Disclosure of records to a district attorney under the provisions of this chapter shall effect no change in the status of the records under any other provision of law.

Back to top

 

Q: Does a public agency have some leeway in adopting regulations about public access to records?

A: Any public agency is free to adopt its own regulations and guidelines so long as they are consistent with, and do not reduce access under, the Act. It is even free to allow access beyond the requirements of the Act - to provide even greater, faster or cheaper access, for example - unless the result would be a disclosure prohibited by some other law. Some state or regional agencies are required to have written access guidelines and to provide free copies of them on request. The CPRA states:

Section 6253. (a) . . . Every agency may adopt regulations stating the procedures to be followed when making its records available in accordance with this section. The following state and local bodies shall establish written guidelines for accessibility of records. A copy of these guidelines shall be posted in a conspicuous public place at the offices of these bodies, and a copy of the guidelines shall be available upon request free of charge to any person requesting that body's records:

Department of Motor Vehicles

Department of Consumer Affairs

Department of Transportation

Department of Real Estate

Department of Corrections

Department of the Youth Authority

Department of Justice

Department of Insurance

Department of Corporations

Secretary of State

State Air Resources Board

Department of Water Resources

Department of Parks and Recreation

San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission

State Board of Equalization

State Department of Health Services

Employment Development Department

State Department of Social Services

State Department of Mental Health

State Department of Developmental Services

State Department of Alcohol and Drug Abuse

Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development

Public Employees' Retirement System

Teachers' Retirement Board

Department of Industrial Relations

Department of General Services

Department of Veterans Affairs

Public Utilities Commission

California Coastal Commission

State Water Quality Control Board

San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District

All regional water quality control boards

Los Angeles County Air Pollution Control District

Bay Area Air Pollution Control District

Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District.

(b) Guidelines and regulations adopted pursuant to this section shall be consistent with all other sections of this chapter and shall reflect the intention of the Legislature to make the records accessible to the public. The guidelines and regulations adopted pursuant to this section shall not operate to limit the hours public records are open for inspection as prescribed in subdivision (a).

Section 6253.1. Except as otherwise prohibited by law, a state or local agency may adopt requirements for itself which allow greater access to records than prescribed by the minimum standards set forth in this chapter.

Back to top

 

Q: Do many agencies provide better access than is strictly required under the CPRA?

A. Not so far. Section 6253.1 is probably the only provision of the Act that almost never gets cited by a government agency as authority for its policy. That section authorizes a reduction of secrecy. It means that unless some particular law clearly mandates a restriction on access, an agency is free to accommodate the public and in effect waive a discretionary exemption. The principal mechanism for this accommodation is found in the variety of local "Sunshine Ordinances" which cities and counties have begun to adopt with the encouragement and assistance of the California First Amendment Coaltion. These policies have been adopted, for example, by the cities of Richmond and Oakland, by Contra Costa County, and by the City and County of San Francisco. For more information, contact CFAC at (916) 974-8888.

Back to top

 

join


Have a legal question?
Check out Asked & Answered first. Chances are, we've already answered it. If not, then proceed to CFAC's Legal Hotline for help from top lawyers—free.


CFAC Archives:


Search CFAC
Google
WWW cfac.org